Mibro Watch GS vs Amazfit Bip U Pro: a solid comparison to buy Are you ready?

In this review, we compare two smartwatches at a competitive price point from two well-known technology brands, Mibro and Amazfit: the Mibro Watch GS smartwatch versus the Amazfit Bip U Pro.

Despite these smartwatches being sold at very similar prices in the smart device market, they also have significant differences that may help you make the optimal purchasing decision between the two.

If you’re looking to buy a reasonably priced, high-quality smartwatch, join us in this article because these watches have garnered the satisfaction of over 90% of buyers on Amazon.

General Specifications of Mibro Watch GS and Amazfit Bip U Pro at a Glance

Following the successful launch of their two smartwatches, Mibro Lite and Mibro Lite 2, which were well-received by users, Mibro has recently introduced a new wearable device called the Mibro Watch GS. It shares the same design and technical specifications as its predecessors but with a more premium feel.

On the other hand, Amazfit, known for its high-quality products in the market, unveiled the new generation of their popular Bip series in 2023, featuring the Bip U Pro smartwatch with fantastic features for fitness enthusiasts. Before comparing and reviewing the different aspects of these two reasonably priced smartwatches, let’s look at the technical specifications table for these wearable devices to understand their presence on paper.

Smart watch name	Mibro Watch GS	Amisfit Bip U Pro
Weight and dimensions	46.5 x 46.5 x 11.8 mm – 56.5 (with strap)	11.4 x 35.5 x 40.9mm – 31g (including strap)
SIM card	NO	NO
Build quality	Durable metal body – silicone strap – round body	Square frame – PC body – TPU silicone strap
Display type and size	1.43-inch AMOLED screen	1.43 inch IPS LCD screen
Display resolution and brightness	Resolution 466 x 466 pixels – HD resolution support – Always on Display support – Image refresh rate 60 Hz – Pixel density 301 pixels/inch	Resolution 302 x 320 pixels – Image refresh rate 60 Hz – Resistant to fingerprints and grease particles – Screen with curved edges (2.5D) – Gorilla Glass 3 screen protector
Operating system, internal memory and RAM	Customized OS compatible with Android 6.0, iOS 10.0 and above – Without internal memory and RAM – Equipped with a dual-core processor with a maximum working frequency of 240MHz	Customized OS compatible with Android 5.0 and iOS 10.0 and above
Warning type	vibration	vibration
Loudspeaker	Does not have	Does not have
GPS	he got it	he got it
battery	460 mAh non-replaceable battery (full charge in 2 hours)	230mAh non-replaceable lithium-polymer battery (full charge in 2 hours)
Sensors	Optical heart rate sensor with ability to calculate blood oxygen level (SpO2)	Optical heart rate sensor with SpO2, accelerometer, gyroscope, and geomagnetic sensor
Connection	No cellular connection	No cellular connection
Bluetooth	Bluetooth version 5.1	Bluetooth version 5.0
water resistant	Yes – up to a depth of 50 meters from the water surface for 10 minutes	Yes – up to a depth of 50 meters from the water surface for 10 minutes
Battery capacity	24 days normal usage – 100 days low usage – 6.5 days high usage	Up to 9 days (normal use) – Up to 5 days (intensive use)
Available colors	Black and grey	Black, green and pink
Messaging	Announce incoming notifications – display text messages	Announce incoming notifications – display text messages
Other features	It has no ability to talk – Supports 70 sports modes, heart rate monitoring, blood oxygen level measurement, sleep status monitoring, stress status monitoring, compatible with Mibro Fit APP, pedometer, phone and calendar notification display, date and time display, timer, Wake up alarm clock	Doesn’t have the ability to talk – supports more than 60 sports modes, microphone, continuous heart rate monitoring, blood oxygen level measurement, stress level monitoring, sleep status monitoring, breathing exercise program, women’s health status monitoring, phone and calendar notification display, display Water and weather status, watch face customization, Alexa voice command support, phone search, music control, camera control

Mibro Watch GS vs. Amazfit Bip U Pro: Design and Build Quality

As is immediately evident at first glance, their design is the most notable difference between the budget-friendly wearables Mibro Watch GS and the smartwatch Amazfit Bip U Pro.

The Mibro Watch GS smartwatch utilizes a classic circular display surrounded by reasonably sized bezels. It gives it a simple yet beautiful appearance, particularly appealing to those who appreciate classic timepieces.

The design of this smartwatch can evoke a sense of traditional wristwatches. It’s worth mentioning the physical frame surrounding the display of this watch, which remains static and imparts a distinctive visual effect to this smartwatch.

On the other hand, the Amazfit Bip U Pro, like most of the company’s smartwatches, features a square-shaped display with slightly raised margins considering its price point. In contrast to the Mibro Watch GS, it boasts a sportier design.

This wearable device boasts an extremely minimalistic frame, with the strap directly connected to the watch’s body and worn compactly on the user’s wrist. This watch is also specially designed for athletic use and can give users the feel of a sports-oriented smartwatch.

The Mibro Watch GS weighs around 56 grams, which may be slightly heavier by a few grams depending on the strap, but the Amazfit Bip U Pro weighs approximately 31 grams. This weight factor has made users comfortable wearing the watch for extended periods without any issues.

Mibro employed a metal frame for this new smartwatch, which, although it added some weight to the watch, provided excellent resistance to potential shocks and scratches.

On the other hand, the Amazfit Bip U Pro is constructed with a polycarbonate body, maintaining its lightweight while resisting potential scratches and shocks. Both watches are also made from hypoallergenic materials to prevent allergic reactions on the user’s skin.

The Amazfit representative features a glossy body, which may be less visually appealing than the non-glossy body of the Mibro Watch GS, but user preferences also play a role in this matter.

Two physical buttons can be seen on the side frame of the Mibro Watch GS smartwatch, allowing you to easily power it on and off and navigate through the watch’s features and applications. On the other hand, there is a rotating button on the right side of the Bip U Pro watch’s body, which users can use to scroll through different sections.

Unfortunately, neither of these smartwatches includes a speaker and microphone for making calls, and the built-in microphone in the Amazfit watch is used solely for the Alexa voice assistant.

Both watches allow for the replacement and sale of different strap models and designs. The Amazfit Bip U Pro utilizes Bluetooth 5.0 to connect to your smart devices, while Mibro supports Bluetooth 5.1.

The Bip U Pro’s body is approximately 11.4 mm, while it measures 11.8 mm in the case of the Mibro GS smartwatch. With these explanations in mind, if wristwatch design elegance is essential to you, choosing the Amazfit wearable may be a more suitable option.

Mibro Watch GS vs. Amazfit Bip U Pro: Display and Features

The Mibro Watch GS and Amazfit Bip U Pro screens differ in several aspects, and choosing between them will depend on your priorities.

If screen quality, clarity, and brightness are among your top considerations when buying a smartwatch, then the Mibro Watch GS smartwatch is your choice.

This wearable is equipped with an AMOLED screen that displays content in a resolution of 466 x 466 pixels for users, with a pixel density of 301 pixels per inch. Its maximum screen brightness also allows for easy use in strong sunlight.

On the other hand, the Amazfit Bip U Pro boasts an LCD IPS screen, offering users a resolution of 302 x 320 pixels, which doesn’t quite match up to its competition.

However, if screen durability is essential to you, choosing the Amazfit Bip U Pro might be the better option. This smartwatch has Gorilla Glass 3 protection, providing excellent resistance against potential shocks and scratches. Additionally, this protective layer repels fingerprints and grease.

Both smartwatches feature a 1.43-inch display, but since the Mibro Watch GS has an AMOLED screen, users can benefit from the highly popular Always On Display feature.

Naturally, in this type of screen, colors are displayed more vividly and attractively, and black appears deeper. Both watches also support a 60Hz refresh rate, offering smooth scrolling for users.

Mibro Watch GS vs. Amazfit Bip U Pro: Hardware and Software Capabilities

We see several differences and similarities between these two smartwatches regarding hardware and software features. The Mibro Watch GS is compatible with Android 6.0 and above and iOS 10 and above, while the Amazfit Bip U Pro connects to Android 5.0 and above and iOS 10.0 and above phones.

Users of these smartwatches must use different apps to connect the watch to their smartphones. “Mibro Fit” is the name of Mibro’s exclusive smartwatch app, which employs a simple yet powerful user interface, allowing users to customize various aspects of the watch.

Access to over 100 watch faces with different themes, tracking daily sports activities, and accessing sensor usage history are among the valuable features of this app.

On the other hand, it’s worth noting the exclusive app for Amazfit wearables, “Zepp,” which, although it has a more complex user interface than the Mibro app, allows users to customize different parts of the watch, including watch faces.

This app offers users various features such as diverse sports activities and health features, a personal profile section, battery status, and more. The Mibro Watch GS has over 200 watch faces, and by adjusting each face on the screen, you’ll see precise color details and dynamics.

Fortunately, both smartwatches support the Persian language in their operating systems and messages without mixing up fonts and words. They also come with a built-in Global Positioning System (GPS).

Thanks to this sensor, users can monitor their sports and training activities highly accurately. Android and iOS operating system users can install this app on their phones.

Despite both smartwatches offering incredibly smooth scrolling for users, the Mibro Watch GS boasts higher processing power due to its dual-core processor with a maximum operating frequency of 240 megahertz.

Mibro Watch GS vs. Amazfit Bip U Pro: Health and Fitness Capabilities

Regarding health features, both these smartwatches in this price range offer excellent and highly accurate capabilities. However, due to Amazfit’s wearables focusing more professionally on health goals, the results of this category’s features for Amazfit Bip U Pro users are more precise and reliable.

The Mibro Watch GS and Amazfit Bip U Pro are equipped with an optical heart rate sensor that can measure blood oxygen levels (SpO2). Still, Amazfit’s BioTrackerTM2 PPG sensor, featured in the Huami-branded wearable, gathers about 30% more data, resulting in higher accuracy.

This sensor measures blood oxygen levels during mental activity or intense physical activities such as climbing, providing a comprehensive report on your health.

• If you care about marketing, read this article.

Another advanced feature in the Amazfit Bip U Pro for monitoring user health is the PAI (Personal Activity Intelligence) indicator. This daily activity indicator provides users with all the data related to their health and regular exercise in the form of a score out of 100.

Additionally, we should mention the accelerometer, gyroscope, and geomagnetic sensor for the Amazfit smartwatch. These smartwatches also come with blood pressure and sleep monitoring capabilities to check your health even during sleep.

Regarding sports capabilities, Mibro has a lot to offer. The Mibro Watch GS supports 70 sports modes, including running, cycling, walking, basketball, and more, recording all your movements.

Moreover, thanks to automatic activity tracking, athletes can safely wear the watch during their workouts and get an overall analysis of their sports performance using the recorded information.

On the other hand, we should mention that Amazfit’s smartwatch supports 60 sports modes, including walking, swimming, yoga, boxing, dancing, winter sports, cycling, climbing, and more. However, it cannot track them automatically.

Mibro Watch GS vs. Amazfit Bip U Pro: Water Resistance

Fortunately, the Mibro Watch GS and Amazfit Bip U Pro smartwatches support water resistance up to 5 ATM (atmospheres), which can withstand water depths up to 50 meters.

Mibro Watch GS vs. Amazfit Bip U Pro: Battery and Charging

Regarding battery life and charging, the Mibro Watch GS can accompany you for much longer thanks to its more powerful battery than the Amazfit Bip U Pro.

The Mibro smartwatch uses a 460mAh battery, which can last up to 24 days in regular use. Additionally, if you frequently use sports features and the Global Positioning System (GPS) for this watch, it can remain operational for up to 6 days. According to Maybro’s claims, this watch can even last up to 100 days in standby mode, although this might be optimistic.

On the other hand, the Amazfit Bip U Pro comes with a 225mAh battery, capable of providing nine days of battery life in regular use. The charging time for both smartwatches is two hours, and neither supports wireless charging.

Mibro GS vs. Amazfit Bip U Pro: Pros and Cons

Let’s compare the Mibro GS and the Amazfit Bip U Pro smartwatches, highlighting their respective pros and cons:

Pros and Cons Mibro Watch GS

Pros:	Cons:
High-quality AMOLED display with Always-On Display support. Dual-core processor. Up to 24 days of battery life. Water-resistant up to 50 meters. Attractive design with classic elements. Support for various health and fitness capabilities. Built-in GPS.	Lack of microphone and speaker for calls. User interface not very user-friendly.

Pros and Cons Amazfit Bip U Pro

Pros:	Cons:
GPS functionality. Support for accurate and high-quality health sensors. Alexa voice support. Proper battery charging.	Lack of voice calling capability. Not a high-quality display. Complex user interface.

conclusion

The comparisons conducted in various aspects of these two smartwatches show that the Mibro Watch GS and the Amazfit Bip U Pro offer excellent value for money. Especially considering that these products are very close in price, with the Mibro representative being sold at a higher price in the market.

In general, if features like an AMOLED display, Always-On Display, GPS, and excellent battery life are essential when purchasing a smartwatch, then the Mibro Watch GS will likely satisfy your needs.

However, if you are looking for a smartwatch with a wide range of health functions, a square display, equipped with GPS, a built-in sports design, and easy usability, then the Amazfit Bip U Pro might be a more suitable option.

What do you think about comparing these two smartwatches and their prices?

Source: 90mobiles